Several people. Deeper questions. Where they disagree is the finding.

• Section 1 · Your group’s Readiness Report — every section of the Readiness Report: where you stand area by area, the shape of your answers, what the pattern means, the findings, what it takes to reach the next level, the ten moves that lift the score fastest, a 90-day sequence and every area in full. Built on your group’s middle answer to each question, not one person’s view.
• Section 2 · Your three focus areas, in depth — the three areas you choose at the kickoff, each answered in depth by the person who owns it.
• Section 3 · Who sees what — who answered and who didn’t; how far apart your people are in every area; where the roles disagree and which pairs of people differ most; who points at whom; office and floor; the common ground; the ten agreed moves; and every question with every person’s answer, including the deeper Level 2 questions.
• Section 4 · One page per person — each person against the group, then their full answer sheet beside the group’s middle answers.
• Section 5 · The readout agenda — the optional 60-minute readout, pre-filled from your answers, so the call goes straight to what matters. If you skip the call, it reads as a guide for your own team meeting.
• Section 6 · Action checklist — every action in the report, numbered once, with a suggested owner. The same list comes as a spreadsheet tracker.
• Section 7 · Your readiness at a glance — the executive dashboard: your group’s position, the range of views and the disagreement map.
• Section 8 · Limits, the scale and re-scoring — what several self-reports still cannot tell you, what each level from 0 to 5 means, and how to re-score in 90 days.
• Section 9 · Where this goes next — the five levels, where you are on them, and the next step if you want to go further.

• The range, not an average — your result reads “between X and Y, depending on who you ask.” Averaging would hide the very thing you need to see.
• Where your people disagree — the questions where roles answer furthest apart, side by side. Each one is a question to ask in the readout, not a verdict.
• Who points at whom — when one role scores another role’s area low and that role scores itself high, the report says so.
• Common ground — what everyone agrees on: the strengths you can build on and the gaps nobody will argue about.
• A level deeper — Level 2 questions in every area go beneath the 25 core questions, answered by everyone. They are only in the Snapshot; the Report goes deeper on three areas you choose.
• Ten moves, weighted by agreement — the moves most of your people already back come first, so the plan starts where it will get traction.

From a sample Snapshot built on a fictional manufacturing plant and six synthetic respondents. The executive summary opens with the range:

Then the three biggest disagreements, each with who said what. The first:

The same question, two people, opposite ends of the scale. That gap is what the readout is for.

• Kickoff by video conference call, 30 minutes — we agree on the facility, the departments and functions in play, who answers (3 to 10 roles from a fixed list) and your three focus areas.
• Everyone answers separately — you forward one link. Each person spends about 30 minutes; the owner of each focus area answers its in-depth questions too. The link stays open for 14 days.
• Named by default — each person gives their name and job title, so you can compare who said what. Choose role-only at the kickoff if your culture needs it; everyone is told which before the first question.
• The report — prepared, reviewed by a person and sent as a PDF with your data files and the action tracker.
• Optional readout by video conference call, 60 minutes — if you want it, we walk your team through the disagreements, the common ground and the ten agreed moves, and agree on who owns each.